General
BEAUCHAMP H. SMITH, Defendant and Plaintiff in Error, v. WILLIAM H. STILWELL, Plaintiff and Defendant in Error
9 Ariz. 22680 Pac. 333·Arizona Supreme Court·1905·AZ
KENT, C. J., and DOAN, J., concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Civil No. 864.
Filed March 30, 1905.]
[80 Pac. 333.]
BEAUCHAMP H. SMITH, Defendant and Plaintiff in Error, v. WILLIAM H. STILWELL, Plaintiff and Defendant in Error.
1. Appeal and Error — Abstracts—Briefs—Failure to File — Dismissal. — Failure of the plaintiff in error to file abstracts and briefs as required by the rules is ground for dismissal of a writ of error.
2. Same — Parties—Personal Bepresentatives. — Failure to make the personal representatives of the defendant (who is deceased) in the judgment sought to be reviewed parties to. the suit is ground for the dismissal of the writ.
ERROR to the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Pima. George R. Davis, Judge.
Dismissed.
The facts are stated in the opinion.
J. F. Conroy, for Plaintiff in Error.
William H. Stilwell, In pro. persona.
[MAJORITY — SLOAN, J.]
SLOAN, J.
The motion to dismiss the writ of error in this ease upon the ground of the failure of the plaintiff in error to file abstracts and briefs as required by the rules of this court, and upon the further ground of the failure to make the personal representatives of the defendant in the judgment sought to be reviewed, who is now deceased, parties to the writ, will be granted, and the writ of error is dismissed.
KENT, C. J., and DOAN, J., concur.