General
Bernard E. Fleischaker and Hugo Baum, Copartners under the Firm Name of Fleischaker & Baum, Appellants, v. Ideal Novelty & Toy Co., Respondent
253 A.D. 794·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1938·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bernard E. Fleischaker and Hugo Baum, Copartners under the Firm Name of Fleischaker & Baum, Appellants, v. Ideal Novelty & Toy Co., Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified to the extent of limiting the books and documents and other records to be produced to the subject-matter of the items on which the examination has been ordered, and as so modified -affirmed, without costs. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.