Contracts · MBE-tested
Bert N. Dawley, Appellant, v. Mary Pearson, Respondent
192 N.Y. 556·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bert N. Dawley, Appellant, v. Mary Pearson, Respondent.
Dawley v. Pearson, 119 App. Div. 869. affirmed.
(Argued April 20, 1908;
decided May 19, 1908.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 7, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special' Term in an action to compel the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property.
Frank Harvey Field and Walter Lester Glenney for appellant.
J. Edward Swanstrom and Conrad Saxe Keyes for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.