Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
NEW YORK STATE v. BARKER, 1900 — 179 U.S. 287 · caselaw · US
Tax
NEW YORK STATE v. BARKER
179 U.S. 28745 L. Ed. 194·Supreme Court of the United States·1900
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NEW YORK STATE v. BARKER
(NO. 2).
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
No. 52.
Argued with No. 51, October 30, 1900.
Decided December 10, 1900.
Same counsel as in No. 51.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Peckham]
Mr. Justice Peckham
delivered the opinion of the court.
This case involves the taxes of 1897, and the same question in substance arises herein that has just been decided in the preceding case, and the judgment is, therefore,
Affirmed.