Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bendet Isaacs, Respondent, v. Jacob Cohn et al., Appellants, 1900 — 161 N.Y. 663 · caselaw · US
General
Bendet Isaacs, Respondent, v. Jacob Cohn et al., Appellants
161 N.Y. 663·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bendet Isaacs, Respondent, v. Jacob Cohn et al., Appellants.
Isaacs v. Oohn, 10 App. Div. 316, affirmed.
(Argued January 26, 1900;
decided February 13, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered respectively November 25,1896, and November 24, 1896, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
J. Mwrray Downs for appellants.
Devoid Bandler for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
• Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett,Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.