Contracts · MBE-tested
Cato v. California
348 U.S. 850·Supreme Court of the United States·1954
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 2,
Misc.
Cato v. California.
Petitioner pro se.
Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General of California, Clarence A. Linn, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Arlo E. Smith, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Court of California. Petition for writ of certiorari denied without prejudice to the petitioner's rights under the facts alleged to prosecute an appeal in the California state courts in accordance with principles announced in People v. Slobodion, 30 Cal. 2d 362, 181 P. 2d 868.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.