Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Abraham Denike, Respondent, v. Mary A. Denike, Impleaded, etc., Appellant, 1898 — 156 N.Y. 665 · caselaw · US
General
Abraham Denike, Respondent, v. Mary A. Denike, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
156 N.Y. 665·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Abraham Denike, Respondent, v. Mary A. Denike, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
Denike v. Denike, 13 Mise. Rep. 381, affirmed.
(Argued May 9, 1898;
decided June 7, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the late City Court of Brooklyn, entered July 1,1895, modifying and, as modified, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
H. J. Morris for appellant.
Raphael J. Moses for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except O’Brien, J., not voting.