General
Catharine Toumey, Respondent, v. O'Reilly, Skelly & Fogarty Company, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
142 N.Y. 678·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Catharine Toumey, Respondent, v. O’Reilly, Skelly & Fogarty Company, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Argued April 27, 1894;
decided June 5, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas for vhe city and county' of New York, entered upon an order made April 4, 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and also affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Edward W. & Johnston for appellant.
Horace Olcvrh Shelly for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.