Administrative
Samuel D. Hinman, Respondent, v. William H. Hare, Appellant
104 N.Y. 641·New York Court of Appeals·1887·NY
Rucee, Oh. J., concurs; Rapallo and Andbews, J J., concur in result \ Danfobth, J., reads for affirmance; Finch, J., concurs. Judgment reversed.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Samuel D. Hinman, Respondent, v. William H. Hare, Appellant.
(Argued March 17, 1886 ;
decided January 18, 1887.)
As a majority of the court did not concur in the opinion written in support of the decision, this case is not reported.
Stephen P. Nash and Samuel Hand for appellant.
Haley Fislce and William Henry Arnoux for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Earl, J.,]
Earl, J.,
reads for reversal and new trial;
Rucee, Oh. J., concurs; Rapallo and Andbews, J J., concur in result \ Danfobth, J., reads for affirmance; Finch, J., concurs. Judgment reversed.