Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co., Inc. v. General Electric Co. et al.
318 U.S. 746·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 876.
Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co., Inc. v. General Electric Co. et al.
April 19, 1943.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The appeal is dismissed on the authority of Ex parte Cutting, 94 U. S. 14; Credits Commutation Co. v. United States, 177 U. S. 311, and United States v. California Coöperative Canneries, 279 U. S. 553, 556.
Mr. Samuel E. Darby, Jr. for appellant. Mr. Alexander C. Neave for appellees.