Torts · MBE-tested
Nicholas Fitzpatrick, Respondent, v. Naughton Company, Appellant
185 N.Y. 591·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nicholas Fitzpatrick, Respondent, v. Naughton Company, Appellant.
Fizpatrick v. Naughton Co., 102 App. Div. 625, affirmed.
(Argued May 24, 1906;
decided June 12, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered March 8, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff,' entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been occasioned by defendant’s negligence.
H. Snowden Marshall for appellant.
Albert A. Wray and Burton W. Gibson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner and Hiscock, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J.