Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John H. Gregory, Respondent, v. John L. Lindsay et al., Appellants, 1875 — 61 N.Y. 649 · caselaw · US
General
John H. Gregory, Respondent, v. John L. Lindsay et al., Appellants
61 N.Y. 649·New York Commission of Appeals·1875·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John H. Gregory, Respondent, v. John L. Lindsay et al., Appellants.
(Argued September 19, 1874;
decided January term, 1875.)
The only questions.presented in this case were as to the rejection of evidence. It was held, that if the rejection was error it was cured by the reception of evidence thereafter proving the facts sought to be established by the rejected evidence.
K. E. W. McEwan for the appellants.
C. W. Van Voorhis for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Reynolds, C.,]
Reynolds, C.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.