Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Metrocentre Improvement District No. 1, City of Little Rock, Arkansas v. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 1982 — 455 U.S. 995 · caselaw · US
General
Metrocentre Improvement District No. 1, City of Little Rock, Arkansas v. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
455 U.S. 995·Supreme Court of the United States·1982
Justice Blackmun, Justice Rehnquist, and Justice O’Connor would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
March 8, 1982
No. 81-865.
Metrocentre Improvement District No. 1, City of Little Rock, Arkansas v. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
[MAJORITY]
Affirmed on appeal from C. A. 8th Cir.
Justice Blackmun, Justice Rehnquist, and Justice O’Connor would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.