Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Andrew Hodge, 1845 — 44 U.S. 534 · caselaw · US
General
United States v. Andrew Hodge
44 U.S. 5343 How. 534·New York Supreme Court·1845·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
United States v. Andrew Hodge.
If the citation be signed by the clerk, and not by a judge of the Circuit Court, or a justice of the Supréme'Court, the case will, on motion, be dismissed.
[MAJORITY — Mr'. Chief Justice TANEY]
Mr'. Chief Justice TANEY
delivered the-opinion of the court on a motion to dismiss this case..'
This case is brought here by a writ of error to the Circuit Court for the eastern district-of Louisiana; and a motion has been made to dismiss it, because the citation was signed by the clerk, and not by a judge of the Circuit Court, or a justice of the- Supreme Court, as directed by the act of Congress ofd789, ch. 20, sect. 22.
. The defendant is not bound to appear, here, unless the citation is signed in the manner prescribed by law; and as that has not been done in this case, the. writ must be dismissed.