Contracts · MBE-tested
Goldstein et al. v. United States
314 U.S. 588·Supreme Court of the United States·1941
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 256.
Goldstein et al. v. United States.
October 13, 1941.
Mr. Theodore Kiendl for Dr. Maximilian Goldstein; Dr. Benjamin Schwartz, Herman Rubin, and Irving Elentuch, pro se. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Messrs. Richard H. Demuth, Oscar A. Provost, and Louis B. Schwartz for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and motion for leave to proceed further in forma pauperis, granted.
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration and decision of this application.