General
Emma J. Betts, Respondent, v. Hiram W. Betts, Appellant, Impleaded with Others; Same v. Same
159 N.Y. 547·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Emma J. Betts, Respondent, v. Hiram W. Betts, Appellant, Impleaded with Others. Same v. Same.
Betts v. Betts, 9 App. Div. 310, affirmed,
(Argued April 38, 1899;
decided June 6, 1899.)
Appeals from judgments of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered ■ October 24, 1896, affirming ¡judgments in favor of plaintiff in each of the above-entitled actions entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Joel M. Marx for appellant.
Benjamin Estes for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgments affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.