Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. United States et al.; and Washington, Virginia & Maryland Coach Co., Inc., et al. v. United States et al., 1969 — 393 U.S. 1017 · caselaw · US
General
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. United States et al.; and Washington, Virginia & Maryland Coach Co., Inc., et al. v. United States et al.
393 U.S. 1017·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 639.
No. 658.
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. United States et al.; and Washington, Virginia & Maryland Coach Co., Inc., et al. v. United States et al.
Russell W. Cunningham for petitioner in No. 639, and Manuel J. Davis and Samuel M. Langerman for petitioners in No. 658. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Martz, Roger P. Marquis, Thomas L. McKevitt, and A. Donald Mileur for the United States et al. in both cases.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.