Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Robert L. Howey, Appellant, v. The Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company, Respondent, 1896 — 148 N.Y. 754 · caselaw · US
General
Robert L. Howey, Appellant, v. The Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company, Respondent
148 N.Y. 754·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Robert L. Howey, Appellant, v. The Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company, Respondent.
(Argued February 17, 1896;
decided February 25, 1896.)
Motion to withdraw appeal.
George IF. Cothran for motion.
James F. Gluc-h opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Granted upon payment of costs of appeal to this court to present time and costs of this motion.