General
United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co. et al.
386 U.S. 978·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
March 24, 1967.
No. 25.
United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co. et al.
Harold D. Burgess and Robert' C. Keck for Arnold, Schwinn & Co., and Earl E. Pollock and Michael M. Lyons for Schwinn Cycle Distributors Association, on the motion.
[For earlier orders herein, see 382 U. S. 936, 384 U. S. 901.]
[MAJORITY]
D. C. N. D. Ill. Motion of counsel for appellees for postponement of argument and for extension of time for filing of appellees’ briefs denied.