Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Mitchell E. Pickens, 1910 — 215 U.S. 617 · caselaw · US
General
The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Mitchell E. Pickens
215 U.S. 617·Supreme Court of the United States·1910
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 528.
The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Mitchell E. Pickens.
January 3, 1910.
Mr. Andrew H. Culwell and Mr. Gardiner Lathrop for plaintiff in error. Mr. Waters Davis for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY]
In error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fourth Supreme Judicial District of the State of Texas.
DíSt .missed with costs, on motion of Mr. Evans Browne, in behalf of counsel for plaintiff in error.