General
George Borgfeldt and Company, Appellant, v. Caroline O'Neill et al., as Executrices of Hugh O'Neill, Deceased, Respondents
177 N.Y. 591·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George Borgfeldt and Company, Appellant, v. Caroline O’Neill et al., as Executrices of Hugh O’Neill, Deceased, Respondents.
Borgfeldt v. O’Neill, 81 App. Div. 636, affirmed.
(Argued February 11, 1904;
decided March 1, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the • Supreme Court m the first judicial department, entered March 31, 1903, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants, entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term without a jury.
James Dunne for appellant.
Isaac Fromme and Edward W. 8. Johnston for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Martin, Vann and Cullen, JJ.