Criminal Law · MBE-tested

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Feliberto Erazo, Appellant

263 A.D.2d 460691 N.Y.S.2d 908·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1999·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Feliberto Erazo, Appellant. [691 NYS2d 908] [MAJORITY] —Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered June 4, 1996, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant’s argument, his sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). The defendant’s remaining arguments are without merit (see, 22 NYCRR 670.6 [a]; People v Wright, 56 NY2d 613; Cuyler v Sullivan, 446 US 335; People v Adams, 247 AD2d 819). Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.