General

Frederick Loeser, Appellant, v. Herman Liebmann et al., Respondents

137 N.Y. 555·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Frederick Loeser, Appellant, v. Herman Liebmann et al., Respondents. This case was argued and decided with and involved the same facts as Loeser v. Liebmann (ante, page 163). The following is the mem. of decision: “We think no case for an injunction was made out, assuming the construction of the lease claimed by the plaintiff to be the true one. “ The judgment should be modified as in the case No. 1, between the same parties, and, as modified, it should be affirmed, with costs to defendant.” [MAJORITY] All concur. Judgment accordingly.