Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of Oscar G. Borkstrom, Respondent, to Compel Jacob Levy, an Attorney at Law, Appellant, to Pay over Certain Moneys, 1901 — 168 N.Y. 639 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of Oscar G. Borkstrom, Respondent, to Compel Jacob Levy, an Attorney at Law, Appellant, to Pay over Certain Moneys
168 N.Y. 639·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Oscar G. Borkstrom, Respondent, to Compel Jacob Levy, an Attorney at Law, Appellant, to Pay over Certain Moneys.
Matter of Boilcstrom, 63 App. Div. 7, affirmed.
(Argued September 30, 1901;
decided October 18, 1901.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 17, 1901, which affirmed an order of Special Term directing the appellant herein to pay over certain moneys to the applicant.
W. R. Spooner and Jacob Levy in person for appellant.
Jesse Grant Roe for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Yann and Landon, JJ.