General

Benny REED v. STATE of Arkansas

320 Ark. 392897 S.W.2d 556·Arkansas Supreme Court·1995·AR

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Benny REED v. STATE of Arkansas CR 95-392 897 S.W.2d 556 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered May 1, 1995 John D. Lightfoot, for appellant. No response. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. Appellant Benny Reed, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. The motion admits that the record was not timely filed, but neither appellant nor his current attorney, admit fault. As such, the motion for rule on the clerk does not state good cause for granting the motion as discussed in our per curiam issued February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964. If appellant’s current attorney, John D. Lightfoot, will concede by affidavit that it was his fault that the record was not filed, or if other good cause is shown, then the motion will be granted. The present motion for rule on the clerk is denied.