Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Catherine A. Ward, as Administratrix of the Estate of John H. Ward, Deceased, Respondent, v. Terry and Tench Construction Company, Appellant, 1907 — 189 N.Y. 542 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
Catherine A. Ward, as Administratrix of the Estate of John H. Ward, Deceased, Respondent, v. Terry and Tench Construction Company, Appellant
189 N.Y. 542·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Catherine A. Ward, as Administratrix of the Estate of John H. Ward, Deceased, Respondent, v. Terry and Tench Construction Company, Appellant.
Ward.v. Terry & Tench Construction Co., 118 App. Div. 80, affirmed,
(Argued September 30, 1907;
decided October 15, 1907.)
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial depart-merit, entered March 15, 1907, which modified and affirmed as modified an order of Special Term granting a motion for leave to amend the summons and complaint in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence.
The following question was certified : “ Did the court have power, under the facts disclosed by the papers on appeal herein filed in this court, to make the order heretofore made and entered herein in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 9th day of November, 1906 \ ”
William J. Moran and Frank Werner Johnson for appellant.
1. Newton Williams for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Olí. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.