General
Adelaide T. Thomson et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Other Parties Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. Rochester Savings Bank et al., Respondents
272 A.D.2d 1100·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1947·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Adelaide T. Thomson et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Other Parties Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. Rochester Savings Bank et al., Respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment, so far as appealed from, affirmed, with costs. All concur; Love, J., not voting. (The portion of the judgment appealed from dismisses plaintiffs’ prayer for an injunction and denies the enforcement of certain restrictions claimed to apply to the property.) Present — Dowling, Harris, McCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.