Corporations
Catherine Caccamo, Respondent, v. Garlock, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Appellant
214 A.D.2d 483625 N.Y.S.2d 905·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1995·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Catherine Caccamo, Respondent, v Garlock, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Appellant.
[625 NYS2d 905]
[MAJORITY]
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered on or about January 12, 1995, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
For the reasons stated in Reid v Georgia-Pacific Corp. (212 AD2d 462) and Salerno v Garlock Inc. (212 AD2d 463), defendant’s motion for summary judgment was properly denied. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Tom, JJ.