Contracts · MBE-tested
Walter Concrete Construction Corp., Respondent, v. PCM Development Company, Appellant
229 A.D.2d 994646 N.Y.S.2d 434·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1996·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Walter Concrete Construction Corp., Respondent, v PCM Development Company, Appellant.
[646 NYS2d 434]
[MAJORITY]
—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: A judgment was entered at the same time as the order from which this appeal was taken. The order is subsumed within the judgment and the appeal is from the judgment, not the order (see, Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988). We exercise our discretion to disregard the misstatement in the notice of appeal (see, CPLR 5520 [c]), and we deem the appeal to have been taken from the judgment (see, Soto v Montanez, 201 AD2d 876; Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, supra). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Gorman, J.—Breach of Contract.) Present—Green, J. P., Law-ton, Wesley, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.