Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
F. D. REESE et al., etc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DALLAS COUNTY, ALABAMA, et al., etc., Defendants-Appellees, 1975 — 519 F.2d 1374 · caselaw · US
General
F. D. REESE et al., etc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DALLAS COUNTY, ALABAMA, et al., etc., Defendants-Appellees
519 F.2d 1374·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1975
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
F. D. REESE et al., etc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DALLAS COUNTY, ALABAMA, et al., etc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 73-3756.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
July 8, 1975.
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORN-BERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY and GEE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — BY THE COURT:]
BY THE COURT:
Pursuant to the order of the Supreme Court of the United States dated May 19, 1975, 421 U.S. 477, 95 S.Ct. 1706, 44 L.Ed.2d 312, reversing the judgment of this Court, 505 F.2d 879, the. cause is hereby remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court.