General
TRADERS' NAT. BANK v. RUMSEY et al.
173 F. 1023·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1909
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
TRADERS’ NAT. BANK v. RUMSEY et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
November 30, 1909.)
No. 1,983.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United. States for the Northern District of Texas.
W. P. McLean, S. B. Cantey, and R. L. Carlock, for appellant John W. Wray, for appellees.
Before PARDEE, McCORMlCK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The record shows that the transactions of Lee M. Rumsey with the Ft. Worth Machine & Foundry Company, wherein the said foundry company issued five promissory notes for the purchase of the stock of the said Rumsey, and granted its mortgage upon all the property of the company to secure payment of the same, were prior to the acquisition of interest by the appellants in this case, and that by the recording of the mortgage according to law and otherwise appellants had full notice of the same. The decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed.