General
In the Matter of the Application of CHARLES H. BRAYNARD, etc., for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
52 Cal. App. 798·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1921·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Crim. No. 562.
Third Appellate District.
May 13, 1921.]
In the Matter of the Application of CHARLES H. BRAYNARD, etc., for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Habeas Corpus—Perjury—Materiality op Testimony—Suppiciency op Evidence.—Writ denied upon the authority of In re Braynard, etc., ante, p. 631.
APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus to secure release under a commitment to answer for perjury.
Denied.
The facts are stated in the opinion In re Braynard, etc., ante, p. 631.
Martin I. Welsh, James T. Matlock and C. H. Braynard for Petitioner.
U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, J. Chas. Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, and Jesse W. Carter for Respondent.
[MAJORITY — THE COURT.]
THE COURT.
It is conceded that the same question is involved in this application as that in In re Braynard, ante, p. 631, [199 Pac. 576], this day decided. For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case the prayer of the petition herein is denied and the writ discharged.