Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General Committee of Adjustment of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. et al.; General Committee of Adjustment of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Southern Pacific Co. et al.; and General Grievance Committee of The Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. General Committee of Adjustment of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers et al.; Switchmen's Union of North America et al. v. National Mediation Board et al., 1943 — 319 U.S. 736 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
General Committee of Adjustment of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. et al.; General Committee of Adjustment of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Southern Pacific Co. et al.; and General Grievance Committee of The Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. General Committee of Adjustment of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers et al.; Switchmen's Union of North America et al. v. National Mediation Board et al.
319 U.S. 736·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Mr. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of the application in No. 937.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 796.
No. 845.
No. 918.
No. 937.
General Committee of Adjustment of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. et al. General Committee of Adjustment of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Southern Pacific Co. et al.; and General Grievance Committee of The Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. General Committee of Adjustment of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers et al. Switchmen’s Union of North America et al. v. National Mediation Board et al.
May 24, 1943.
Messrs. John W. Madden, Jr., Clarence E. Weisell, and Harold N. McLaughlin for petitioner in No. 796. Messrs. George M. Naus and Clarence E. Weisell for petitioner in No. 845. Messrs. Donald R. Richberg, Felix T. Smith, and Francis R. Kirkham for petitioner in No. 918. Messrs. Donald R. Richberg and Rufus G. Poole for petitioners in No. 937. Messrs. George M. Naus, Clarence E. Weisell, and Harold N. McLaughlin for the General Committee of Adjustment of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, respondent in No. 918. Solicitor General Fahy and Mr. Robert L. Stern for the National Mediation Board et al.; and Messrs. Bernard M. Savage and Alfred L. Bennett for the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, — respondents in No. 937.
[MAJORITY]
The petitions for writs of certiorari in these cases are granted.
Mr. Justice Rutledge took no part in the consideration or decision of the application in No. 937.