General
In the Matter of Roque L., Jr., Appellant, v. Nancy L., Respondent
8 A.D.3d 94777 N.Y.S.2d 908·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2004·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Roque L., Jr., Appellant, v Nancy L., Respondent.
[777 NYS2d 908]
[MAJORITY]
Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered on or about March 20, 2001, which, inter alia, denied petitioner’s application for a change of custody of the parties’ child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
No basis exists to disturb Family Court’s finding that a change of custody would not be in the child’s best interests (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167,173-174 [1982]). Petitioner’s challenge to the report and testimony of the court-appointed psychologist is unsupported by expert evidence and otherwise unpersuasive. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.