Contracts · MBE-tested
MONTGOMERY, DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, et al. v. KAISER et al.
397 U.S. 595·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Brennan, and Mr. Justice Marshall are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MONTGOMERY, DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, et al. v. KAISER et al.
No. 828.
Decided April 20, 1970
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Elizabeth Palmer, Deputy Attorney General, for appellants.
Thomas L. Fike for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for further consideration in light of Dandridge v. Williams, ante, p. 471.
Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Brennan, and Mr. Justice Marshall are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.