Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles H. Woodward, Plaintiff, v. The Holland Medicine Company et al., Defendants. Frank L. Anderson, Appellant; Frederick Haller, Receiver, Respondent, 1899 — 159 N.Y. 544 · caselaw · US
General
Charles H. Woodward, Plaintiff, v. The Holland Medicine Company et al., Defendants. Frank L. Anderson, Appellant; Frederick Haller, Receiver, Respondent
159 N.Y. 544·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles H. Woodward, Plaintiff, v. The Holland Medicine Company et al., Defendants. Frank L. Anderson, Appellant; Frederick Haller, Receiver, Respondent.
Woodard v. Holland Medicine Co., 9 App. Div. 632, appeal dismissed.
(Argued April 26, 1899;
decided June 6, 1899.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered October 22, 1896, affirming an order ot Special Term confirming the report of a referee.
Charles B. Wheeler for appellant.
Le Boy Parlcer for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.