General
Bridget Ward, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. The Rochester Electric Railway Company, Respondent
141 N.Y. 561·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Bridget Ward, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. The Rochester Electric Railway Company, Respondent.
(Argued December 21, 1893;
decided January 16, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made January 22, 1892, which denied a motion for a new tidal and ordered judgment for defendant upon a decision of the court nonsuiting plaintiffs on trial at Circuit.
Qumcy Van Voorhis for appellant.
Theodore Bacon for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Babtlett, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.