Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sylvester J. Craver, Appellant, v. Lucinda Willson, Respondent, 1872 — 47 N.Y. 673 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Sylvester J. Craver, Appellant, v. Lucinda Willson, Respondent
47 N.Y. 673·New York Court of Appeals·1872·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sylvester J. Craver, Appellant, v. Lucinda Willson, Respondent.
(Argued February 19, 1872;
decided February 27, 1872.)
Action to foreclose a mortgage, executed by defendant to plaintiff as collateral to a bond. The. bond and mortgage were executed by defendant, a married woman, for the purpose of raising §1,000, §800 to be loaned to John H. Dearstyne and §200 for the benefit of James Willson, defendant’s husband. They were intrusted to James Dearstyne, who delivered them to the plaintiff, to be held as collateral security for a judgment he held against said James and others. Held, there was no consideration for the bond and mortgage, and a clear misappropriation thereof, and that plaintiff was not entitled to, recover.
I. Browne for appellant.
I. Lcmson for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion of Parker, J., in Supreme Court.