General

HENRY T. BALDRIDGE, Appellant, v. JAMES REILLY, Appellee

2 Ariz. 443·Arizona Supreme Court·1888·AZ

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

HENRY T. BALDRIDGE, Appellant, v. JAMES REILLY, Appellee. (Civil No. 227.) APPEAL from the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Cochise. Geo. G. Berry, for Appellant. Thomas Mitchell, for Appellee. [MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.] PER CURIAM. We think that the probate court erred in striking out that portion of defendant’s answer to the petition for distribution wherein there was a denial of a balance in the hands of the removed administrator, Reilly, and for that reason affirm the judgment of the District Court, holding for naught the judgment of the probate court, entered March 15, 1887. (Opinion filed May 26, 1888.)