Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
ILOWITE v. UNITED STATES et al., 1968 — 393 U.S. 15 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
ILOWITE v. UNITED STATES et al.
393 U.S. 15·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ILOWITE v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 263.
Decided October 14, 1968.
Victor Rabinowitz, Leonard B. Boudin, Michael B. Standard, and David Rosenberg for petitioner.
Solicitor General Griswold and Henry Getter for the United States et al.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Upon consideration of the suggestion of mootness and an examination of the entire record, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to dismiss the case as moot.