Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Loftus Wood, Appellant, v. Charles F. Tonges et al., Respondents, 1878 — 74 N.Y. 612 · caselaw · US
General
Loftus Wood, Appellant, v. Charles F. Tonges et al., Respondents
74 N.Y. 612·New York Court of Appeals·1878·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Loftus Wood, Appellant, v. Charles F. Tonges et al., Respondents.
(Argued June 14, 1878;
decided September 24, 1878.)
Theo. F. Jackson for appellant.
John H. Bergen for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm. No opinion.
All concur, except Miller and Earl, JJ., absent; Hand, J., taking no part.
Judgment affirmed.