Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. et al. v. Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen et al., 1966 — 384 U.S. 1000 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. et al. v. Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen et al.
384 U.S. 1000·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1402.
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. et al. v. Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen et al.
Paul A. Porter, Abe Krash, Dennis G. Lyons, Daniel A. Rezneck, Prime F. Osborn III and W. E. Grissett, Jr., for petitioners.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted and case set for oral argument during the week of October 10, 1966.
Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.