General
Bert Rucker v. Marion A. Tatlow
251 U.S. 537·Supreme Court of the United States·1919
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 59.
Bert Rucker v. Marion A. Tatlow.
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas.
Submitted November 10, 1919.
Decided November 17, 1919.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 79; Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216, 218; United Surety Co. v. American Fruit Co., 238 U. S. 140, 142; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182, 184. Mr. Joseph G. Waters and Mr. Joseph M. Stark for plaintiff in error. Mr. Lee Monroe for defendant in error.