General
New York Terrace Estates, Inc., and Others, Appellants, v. Richmond Development Company, Respondent
224 A.D. 765·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1928·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
New York Terrace Estates, Inc., and Others, Appellants, v. Richmond Development Company, Respondent.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[MAJORITY]
Order, in so far as appealed from, reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars as to the tenth and eleventh items thereof denied, without costs. The general rule that a party may not have the names of his adversary’s witnesses is applicable to those items. The situation does not come within the well-defined exceptions to that rule. (Claflin Co. v. Knapp, 60 App. Div. 9; Goakes v. City of Oneida, 180 id. 118.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.