General
ROANOKE-GOODWATER PINE CO. v. CANNON
256 Ala. 40455 So. 2d 137·Alabama Supreme Court·1951·AL
LIVINGSTON, C. J., and SIMPSON and GOODWYN, JJ., concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
55 So.2d 137
ROANOKE-GOODWATER PINE CO. v. CANNON.
5 Div. 528.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
Nov. 15, 1951.
Wilbanks & Wilbanks, Alexander City, for petitioner.
Teel & Teel, Rockford, opposed.
[MAJORITY — FOSTER, Justice.]
FOSTER, Justice.
The petition for certiorari to the Court of Appeals filed by the Roanoke-Goodwater Pine Company in the case of Roanoke-Goodwater Pine Co. v. Cannon, Ala.App., 55 So.2d 135, is not on transcript paper as required by Supreme Court 36, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix, and must therefore be stricken. Peterson v. State, 248 Ala. 179, 27 So.2d 30; Allen v. State, 249 Ala. 201, 30 So.2d 483; Maddox v. City of Birmingham, 255 Ala. 440, 52 So.2d 166.
Petition for certiorari stricken.
LIVINGSTON, C. J., and SIMPSON and GOODWYN, JJ., concur.