Contracts · MBE-tested
Crummer Company et al. v. DuPont et al.
350 U.S. 848·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 300.
Crummer Company et al. v. DuPont et al.
Francis P. Whitehair, Warren Hall and Chris Dixie for petitioners. Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and Ralph M. McLane, Assistant Attorney General, for Clements et al., Clarence G. Ashby for DuPont et al., Donald Russell for Ball et al., Charles R. Scott for the St. Joe Paper Co., William H. Rogers for Pierce et al., Asbury Sum- merlin for Gall, John W. Donahoo and Chester Bedell for the Cummer Sons Cypress Co., and H. M. Voorhis and W. H. Poe for Leedy, Wheeler & Alientan, Inc. et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.