Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John S. SORENSON and T. S. B. Nielsen, Copartners Trading under the Firm Name and Style of Sorenson & Nielsen, Appellants, v. BELTS WHARF WAREHOUSE, Inc., Curtis Bay Towing Company, and Monarch Stevedore Company, Appellees; J. ARON & COMPANY, Inc., on Behalf of Itself and of Its Automobile Insurance Company, Intervening Petitioner, Appellant, v. BELTS WHARF WAREHOUSE, Inc., Curtis Bay Towing Company and Monarch Stevedore Company, Appellees, 1926 — 9 F.2d 1021 · caselaw · US
General
John S. SORENSON and T. S. B. Nielsen, Copartners Trading under the Firm Name and Style of Sorenson & Nielsen, Appellants, v. BELTS WHARF WAREHOUSE, Inc., Curtis Bay Towing Company, and Monarch Stevedore Company, Appellees; J. ARON & COMPANY, Inc., on Behalf of Itself and of Its Automobile Insurance Company, Intervening Petitioner, Appellant, v. BELTS WHARF WAREHOUSE, Inc., Curtis Bay Towing Company and Monarch Stevedore Company, Appellees
9 F.2d 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John S. SORENSON and T. S. B. Nielsen, Copartners Trading under the Firm Name and Style of Sorenson & Nielsen, Appellants, v. BELTS WHARF WAREHOUSE, Inc., Curtis Bay Towing Company, and Monarch Stevedore Company, Appellees. J. ARON & COMPANY, Inc., on Behalf of Itself and of Its Automobile Insurance Company, Intervening Petitioner, Appellant, v. BELTS WHARF WAREHOUSE, Inc., Curtis Bay Towing Company and Monarch Stevedore Company, Appellees.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
January 15, 1926.)
Nos. 2405, 2406.
Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Frank B. Ober and Stuart S. Janney, both of Baltimore, Md. (Janney, Ober, Slingluff & Williams, of Baltimore, Md., and Bigham, Englar & Jones, of New York City, on the brief), for appellants.
L. Vernon Miller and Frank Gosnell, both of Baltimore, Md. (Marbury, Gosnell & Williams, of Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellees.
Before ROSE and PARKER, Circuit Judges, and WATKINS, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
These appeals bring up for review no questions of law. They turn upon matters of fact, or upon what are the inferences properly to he drawn from facts admitted or supposed to be proved. Wo have examined the record, and are satisfied with the conclusion below.
Affirmed.