Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Chester Hair, Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company, Appellant, 1873 — 53 N.Y. 611 · caselaw · US
General
Chester Hair, Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company, Appellant
53 N.Y. 611·New York Court of Appeals·1873·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Chester Hair, Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company, Appellant.
(Argued May 16, 1873;
decided May 27, 1873.)
Martin I. Townsend for the appellant.
Frank Hiscock for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
All concur for reversal of order granting a new trial and for judgment against plaintiff on nonsuit.
No opinion.
Ordered accordingly.