Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John R. Malany, Respondent, v. Nathan S. Perkins, Appellant, 1897 — 153 N.Y. 648 · caselaw · US
General
John R. Malany, Respondent, v. Nathan S. Perkins, Appellant
153 N.Y. 648·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John R. Malany, Respondent, v. Nathan S. Perkins, Appellant.
Malany v. Perkins, 12 App. Div. 625, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted April 19, 1897;
decided May 4, 1897.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 19, 1896, which affirmed a judgment of the Monroe County Court affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff rendered by the Municipal Court of the city of Rochester.
The motion was made upon the ground that the Appellate Division had not allowed an appeal to the Court of Appeals nor had it certified any question of law for review.
Bills <& 8mythe for motion.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted, with costs.