Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Empire Mill Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Blackwell Lumber Company, 1917 — 244 U.S. 651 · caselaw · US
General
Empire Mill Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Blackwell Lumber Company
244 U.S. 651·Supreme Court of the United States·1917
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 786.
Empire Mill Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Blackwell Lumber Company.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho.
Motion to dismiss or affirm or modify supersedeas submitted June 4, 1917.
Decided June 11, 1917.
Mr. Charles W. Beale for plaintiff in error.
Mr. John P. Gray for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction Upon the authority of Luxton v. North River Bridge Co., 147 U. S. 337; Southern Railway Co. v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co., 179 U. S. 641; Grays Harbor Logging Co. v. Coats-Fordney Logging Co., 243 U. S. 251.